Walter Jon Williams, the man who changed how I write, is kind enough to weigh in on his writing process. If you would like to change the way you write, you should visit the Taos Toolbox page on this site.
***
Tamago: Do you have a regular drafting process, or does your drafting process vary from book to book? (If it varies, please keep one project in mind as you answer these questions.)
Walter: Normally I start at the beginning and work through to the end, following an outline I've carefully constructed beforehand. Sometimes, though, I'll start by writing several key scenes, then string them together afterwards.
Tamago: Which part of writing--drafting, revising, critique from others--do you enjoy the most? Why? The least? Why?
Walter: The most fun part is the most creative part, which is coming up with the idea, developing it, and constructing the outline. Drafting can range from tedious to enormous fun, depending on how close I am to my original inspiration. Some books are a joy to write, and some are a slog, and I don't know which is which till it happens.
Redrafting is generally enjoyable, because I get to rediscover earlier parts of the work. The critiques can be fun, because I get to see my friends, and the comments are often useful.
Tamago: What is the longest time it's taken you to complete a project? The shortest time?
Walter: I think I've written a short-short in one sitting. But that's not hard.
The longest I've taken on a book was two years, but then the book was more than twice as long as my average book, something well into George RR Martin territory. It was a horrific experience, and I never want to do it again.
Tamago: In what ways, if any, has your writing process changed over time?
Walter: I've grown a lot more organized. I always had outlines, but now my outlines are a lot more detailed, with the big scenes all set out.
And I've also got better. There's a good deal less anxiety when I run into a problem, because I have more skills to deploy.
Tamago: Do you work alone, or do you participate in a critique group? What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages to your approach?
Walter: I've worked with one critique group or another for thirty years. The only disadvantage to working with a critique group that features four or five full-time writers is that the pages add up, and you have to devote a lot of time to reading your colleagues' work. But then most of my colleagues write pretty good stuff, so that's a minor complaint at best.
Mirrored from Writer Tamago.