cathschaffstump: (Default)
[personal profile] cathschaffstump

Noting that JABberwocky sent me my rejection yesterday afternoon.

***

On our way to the break out novel so far, we’ve discussed the “good” book, what makes a book good for discussion, and what the heck literature is anyway. I try to keep this discussion very accessible to my college students.

I’ll admit, the genre discussion is one that we don’t have in class. My colleagues at the college and I *do* teach genre books frequently in our classes. Two of us use Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale for example. At its core, another book I teach, Native Son is a murder mystery as well as a social commentary. The separation of literature from genre is often artificial. Speculative fiction, a “new” field of writing, suggests that it is novel to combine genres. I have friends that are currently publishing “forensic fantasy.” Alternative history has been accepted as fantasy, but is really a happy marriage of fantasy and historical. Urban romance combines the fantastic with gritty action-adventure.

Genre divisions are very artificial indeed. How do we decide what a genre is? After all, we can break out of a genre with our break out novel if we don’t know we’re trying to break out of.

Read the rest of this entry »

Originally published at Writer Tamago. You can comment here or there.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ebenstone.livejournal.com
Perhaps the rejection you got from JABerwocky was cut from the form rejection that mine was cut from, considering it was only a third of a page! Tee-hee!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-05-13 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] awelkin.livejournal.com
Maybe it was. :)

Catherine

Profile

cathschaffstump: (Default)
cathschaffstump

March 2017

S M T W T F S
    1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags