Sister Night, Sister Moon
Jul. 2nd, 2007 01:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This time, the rejection was because the story was not dark enough for the anthology. The story worked for the editor until the ending, and I can buy that. I became antsy about getting it done, rather than letting the thing take some time and letting my subconscious puzzle it out, which is ALWAYS my best strategy. (Watch the Type A personality fight the inner artist. Go on! You know you want to!)
Again, encouraging words:
I am not going to accept this story because I don't think it quite fits with the darker tone of the other stories I am looking at... and that's the only reason that I am not going to accept it. If I were doing a different anthology I would just ask for a rewrite of the ending...
What have we learned, author buddies? Both the take home message for me with this rejection and with Delirium has been, "this is good, but it's not what we want." So...with careful work, we get the good work to the right person. Your market research, when you can do it, is essential.
Both Cat Scratch and Delirium still each have one. We're still a contender. :)
Catherine
Again, encouraging words:
I am not going to accept this story because I don't think it quite fits with the darker tone of the other stories I am looking at... and that's the only reason that I am not going to accept it. If I were doing a different anthology I would just ask for a rewrite of the ending...
What have we learned, author buddies? Both the take home message for me with this rejection and with Delirium has been, "this is good, but it's not what we want." So...with careful work, we get the good work to the right person. Your market research, when you can do it, is essential.
Both Cat Scratch and Delirium still each have one. We're still a contender. :)
Catherine
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-02 07:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-02 07:16 pm (UTC)Remember that an agent, like an author is one person at a time.
BTW, had a GREAT conversation with Yo about writing last night. We need to talk soon, you and I.
Catherine
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-02 07:43 pm (UTC)I like your lesson about listening to your intuition, though. I've read story after story that feels like it was rushed to be finished, and that always shows. You know you're good at your craft. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are good at this craft. Learning to listen, being true to what you want instead of what you feel like you have to do in a hurry... these are things that set excellent writers apart from the merely good ones.
Or something. I'm babbling. Writer's prerogative.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-03 01:23 am (UTC)However, artist!Catherine gets a rematch every time she revises, and/or an editor calls her on it. I just gotta get goal driven!Catherine to listen more.
Maybe if I whack her on the nose with a rolled up newspaper from time to time...
Are you sending stuff out now?
Catherine
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-03 06:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-02 09:46 pm (UTC)(((Hug)))
I received a heavyweight rejection yesterday. Heavyweight, in that this was from the first (and only, so far) agent to request a full MS of my first novel. It wasn't a form rejection. She explained why she's passing. I don't agree with her take on it, but appreciate her generosity in taking the time to write.
At the risk of sounding Pollyanna-ish, I can still welcome rejections because every one of them is a step towards finding the perfect agent for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-03 01:26 am (UTC)On the one hand, it's great to get the attention, and you know you're on the right track. On the other hand, well, wouldn't you really rather have the good news?
Keep at it, though. Perserverance is key, yes?
Catherine
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-03 04:27 pm (UTC)*One immediate rejection and one request for a partial 12 hours later. Balance. Om. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 07:15 am (UTC)